Processing math: 0%

Friday, December 2, 2016

Affine Morphisms: affine-local on target

A morphism \pi: X \to Y is affine if for every affine open U \subset Y, \pi^{-1}(U) is affine.

Clearly, affine morphisms are quasi-compact and quasi-separated (since affine schemes are).

Proposition. \pi is affine iff there is a cover of Y by affine opens U_{\alpha} such that \pi^{-1}(U_{\alpha}) is affine.

The proposition has some nonobvious consequence. Recall that if Z \subset \text{Spec} A is globally cut out by an equation (i.e. Z = \mathbb{V}(V)) then its complement is affine. It turns out that is is also true if Z is locally cut out by an equation.

Corollary. Let Z be a closed subset of X = \text{Spec} A. Suppose X can be covered by affine open sets on each of which Z is cut out by one equation. Then the complement of Z is affine.
--------------------------
Proof of Proposition. By the Affine Communication Lemma, it suffices to check that the condition \pi^{-1}(U) (variable U) is affine-local. This is equivalent to checking the following to criteria.

  1. Suppose \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B) = \text{Spec} A is affine. Then for all g \in B, \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B_g) is affine.
    Proof. We have \pi restricts to a map \text{Spec} A \to \text{Spec} B which must be induced from some \phi: B \to A. Localization gives \phi_g: B_g \to A_\phi(g)  which must induce the restriction of \pi: \text{Spec} A_\phi(g) \to \text{Spec} B_g. So \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B_g) = \text{Spec} A_{\phi(g)}.
  2. Suppose (g_1, \ldots, g_n) = B and \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B_{g_i}) = \text{Spec} A_i is affine. Then \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B) is affine.
    Proof. Let Z = \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B). Let A = O_X(Z). We want to show that Z is affine, i.e. (Z, O_Z) is isomorphic  to (\text{Spec} A, O_{\text{Spec} A}) via the canonical map \alpha: Z \to  \text{Spec} A which is induced by A \to O_Z(Z). (Think of the case Z is affine. For general case, use gluing).

    The factorization B \to A \to O_Z(Z) gives a factorization \pi: Z \xrightarrow{\alpha} \text{Spec} A \xrightarrow{\beta} \text{Spec} B. As \alpha and \beta are both surjective, and since D(g_i)'s cover \text{Spec} B, we must have \beta^{-1}(D(g_i))'s cover \text{Spec} A.

    Thus it suffices to show that \alpha|_{\pi^{-1}(D(g_i)} : \pi^{-1}(D(g_i)) \to \beta^{-1}(D(g_i)) is an isomorphism for each i. Then by gluing, \alpha is an isomorphism Z \to \text{Spec} A (or by stalk).

    Abusing notation, we denote both \beta^{\sharp}g_i (an element of A) and \pi^{\sharp}g_i (an element of O_Z(Z)) by f_i. Then \beta^{-1}D(g_i) = D(f_i) = \text{Spec} A_{f_i} \subset \text{Spec} A.

    On the other hand, \pi^{-1}(D(g_i)) = Z_{f_i} = \text{Spec} A_i. It suffices to show that \alpha^{\sharp} induces an isomorphism A_{f_i} \to A_i.

    Indeed, notice that Z is quasi-compact and quasi-separated since these notion are affine-local, and we have assume that \pi is affine (hence quasi-compact and quasi-separated) on an open cover of \text{Spec} B. Then by the QCQS Lemma, we have the canonical map A_{f_i} = (O_Z(Z))_{f_i} \to O_Z(Z_{f_i}) = A_i is an isomorphism.
------------------------------
Proof of Corollary.

Suppose (U_{\alpha})_{\alpha} is an affine cover of X= \text{Spec} A such that on each U_{\alpha}, Z is cut out by an equation f_{\alpha}. Let V = X - Z and \pi: V \to X be the inclusion map. Then \pi^{-1}(U_{\alpha}) = U_{\alpha} \backslash Z is affine so \pi is an affine map.  Thus \pi^{-1} (X) must also be affine.  QED.





No comments:

Post a Comment