Clearly, affine morphisms are quasi-compact and quasi-separated (since affine schemes are).
Proposition. \pi is affine iff there is a cover of Y by affine opens U_{\alpha} such that \pi^{-1}(U_{\alpha}) is affine.
The proposition has some nonobvious consequence. Recall that if Z \subset \text{Spec} A is globally cut out by an equation (i.e. Z = \mathbb{V}(V)) then its complement is affine. It turns out that is is also true if Z is locally cut out by an equation.
Corollary. Let Z be a closed subset of X = \text{Spec} A. Suppose X can be covered by affine open sets on each of which Z is cut out by one equation. Then the complement of Z is affine.
--------------------------Proof of Proposition. By the Affine Communication Lemma, it suffices to check that the condition \pi^{-1}(U) (variable U) is affine-local. This is equivalent to checking the following to criteria.
- Suppose \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B) = \text{Spec} A is affine. Then for all g \in B, \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B_g) is affine.
Proof. We have \pi restricts to a map \text{Spec} A \to \text{Spec} B which must be induced from some \phi: B \to A. Localization gives \phi_g: B_g \to A_\phi(g) which must induce the restriction of \pi: \text{Spec} A_\phi(g) \to \text{Spec} B_g. So \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B_g) = \text{Spec} A_{\phi(g)}. - Suppose (g_1, \ldots, g_n) = B and \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B_{g_i}) = \text{Spec} A_i is affine. Then \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B) is affine.
Proof. Let Z = \pi^{-1}(\text{Spec} B). Let A = O_X(Z). We want to show that Z is affine, i.e. (Z, O_Z) is isomorphic to (\text{Spec} A, O_{\text{Spec} A}) via the canonical map \alpha: Z \to \text{Spec} A which is induced by A \to O_Z(Z). (Think of the case Z is affine. For general case, use gluing).
The factorization B \to A \to O_Z(Z) gives a factorization \pi: Z \xrightarrow{\alpha} \text{Spec} A \xrightarrow{\beta} \text{Spec} B. As \alpha and \beta are both surjective, and since D(g_i)'s cover \text{Spec} B, we must have \beta^{-1}(D(g_i))'s cover \text{Spec} A.
Thus it suffices to show that \alpha|_{\pi^{-1}(D(g_i)} : \pi^{-1}(D(g_i)) \to \beta^{-1}(D(g_i)) is an isomorphism for each i. Then by gluing, \alpha is an isomorphism Z \to \text{Spec} A (or by stalk).
Abusing notation, we denote both \beta^{\sharp}g_i (an element of A) and \pi^{\sharp}g_i (an element of O_Z(Z)) by f_i. Then \beta^{-1}D(g_i) = D(f_i) = \text{Spec} A_{f_i} \subset \text{Spec} A.
On the other hand, \pi^{-1}(D(g_i)) = Z_{f_i} = \text{Spec} A_i. It suffices to show that \alpha^{\sharp} induces an isomorphism A_{f_i} \to A_i.
Indeed, notice that Z is quasi-compact and quasi-separated since these notion are affine-local, and we have assume that \pi is affine (hence quasi-compact and quasi-separated) on an open cover of \text{Spec} B. Then by the QCQS Lemma, we have the canonical map A_{f_i} = (O_Z(Z))_{f_i} \to O_Z(Z_{f_i}) = A_i is an isomorphism.
Proof of Corollary.
No comments:
Post a Comment