Processing math: 100%

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Dominant Maps and Generic Points

Proposition. Let \varphi: A \to B and f: \text{Spec} B \to \text{Spec} A be the induced map. Then \text{Im} f is dense in \text{Spec} A iff \varphi^{-1}(\sqrt{0_B}) \subset \sqrt{0_A}.
Equivalently, \ker \varphi \subset \sqrt{0_A}.

Proof.  Note that \text{Im} f = \{ \varphi^{-1}(q) \mid q \in \text{Spec} B \}. So
\overline{\text{Im} f} = \mathbb{V}\left( \bigcap_{q \in \text{Spec} B} \varphi^{-1} q \right)
But \bigcap_{q \in \text{Spec} B} \varphi^{-1} q = \varphi^{-1} \left( \bigcap_{q \in \text{Spec} B} q\right) = \varphi^{-1}(\sqrt{0_B}).
Thus \overline{\text{Im} f} = \text{Spec} A = \mathbb{V}(\sqrt{0_A}) \iff \varphi^{-1}(\sqrt{0_B}) \subset \sqrt{0_A}.
------
Note that for a set S \in \text{Spec} B, \overline{S} = \bigcup_{s \in S} \overline{\{s\}} = \bigcup \mathbb{V}(s) = \mathbb{V}\left( \bigcap \mathfrak{p}_s\right).
------
If \text{Spec} A and \text{Spec} B are both irreducible, then their nilradicals are their generic points, so the above statement is equivalent to saying that \text{Im} f is dense iff f maps generic pt to generic pt. There is a generalization of this.
---------------------
Proposition. A rational map \pi: X \dashrightarrow Y of irreducible schemes is dominant iff \pi sends the genetic point \eta_X of X to the generic point \eta_Y of Y. 
Proof. Let (U, \pi) be a representation of \pi. Note that every open set of X contains \eta_X.

Suppose \pi(\eta_X) = \eta_Y. Then \pi(U) \ni \eta_Y so must be dense in Y.

Conversely, suppose that \pi(U) is dense in Y.  Let V\cong \text{Spec} B be an affine open of Y.   Cover \pi^{-1}(V) by (finitely many) affine opens U_i\text{Spec} A_i. Then \pi gives a morphism
\pi': \bigsqcup U_i \to V.
As \pi is dominant, we must have image of \pi' (which is equal to image of \pi|_{\pi^{-1}(V)}) is dense in V. On the other hand
\bigsqcup U_i = \bigsqcup \text{Spec} A_i = \text{Spec} \left(\prod A_i\right). Let A = \prod A_i. Suppose \varphi: B \to A is the induced map on global sections.

As the image of \pi' is dense we know that \varphi^{-1}(\sqrt{0_A}) \supset \sqrt{0_B}, which is \eta_Y. On the other hand (\sqrt{0_A}) = \bigcap_{p \in A_1, A_2, \ldots, A_n} p  as \text{Spec} A =  \bigsqcup \text{Spec} A_i. Thus for each A_i, as \bigcap_{p \in A_i} p \supset \bigcap_{p \in A_1, A_2, \ldots, A_n} p we have \varphi^{-1}(\bigcap_{p \in A_i}) \supset \sqrt{0_B}). But the former is just \pi(\eta_X).
----
Note: Recall that every open subset of an irreducible space is irreducible.

Note: If \eta is the generic point of an irreducible scheme X and U = \text{Spec} A is a affine open of X then \eta is the generic point of U (i.e., corresponding to the nilradical of A).
-------
Quicker method: Suppose \pi(\eta_X) \neq \eta_Y. Then U = Y - \overline{\pi(\eta_X)} \neq \emptyset. As \pi(X) is dense in Y, U \cap \pi(X) \neq \emptyset so \pi^{-1}(U) is not empty and thus must contain \eta_X, a contradiction.


No comments:

Post a Comment